Submitted by Apple isn’t the only one coming up with some seriously aggressive pricing schemes; a leaked memo from Best Buy indicates that Microsoft is willing to price Windows 7 upgrades pretty low too, but not as low as Snow Leopard, though. Still, the memo includes some interesting facts and also reveals the dates for when the upgrade program runs. As usual with Microsoft, caveats and version complications. Also, a table comparing the various upgrade prices of both Windows 7 and Snow Leopard can be found inside.
The leaked Best Buy memos gives the dates for the free upgrade program, which is a Microsoft tradition in which people who buy new machines with current Windows versions around the release date of the next version will get a free upgrade to this new version. According to the leaked Best Buy memo, the program starts June 26, and will end October 22 when Windows 7 gets released. What this means is that buyers of new computers with Vista Home Premium, Business or Ultimate pre installed within this timeframe will get a free upgrade for Windows 7. This also goes for boxed retail copies of Windows Vista Home Premium, Business, and Ultimate. Windows Vista Home Basic isn’t part of the deal, but I’m not even sure if they still sell that crippled operating system.
The memo also reveals the pre-order prices of Windows 7 starting June 26, but these deals may very well be Best Buy-specific. Windows 7 Home Premium upgrade will cost 49.99 USD, while Windows 7 Professional upgrade will go for 99.99 USD. These deals end July 11. The big question here is of course whether or not these deals will be Best Buy-specific, or if they are world-wide. Pricing information for Windows 7 will be made available later this month. Also note that Windows 7 Home Premium and Professional will be the only available versions in the Western world.
It is tempting to compare this information to the Snow Leopard pricing information, but there are many unknowns on both sides: how will the Snow Leopard upgrade, priced at 29 USD work? Will it require a pre-installed Leopard copy, or a disc (like Apple’s Up-to-Date program always does)? Maybe product activation? Are the upgrade prices for Windows 7 at Best Buy worldwide, or Best Buy-specific? Are they truly deals, or are these default prices for all the upgrades during the entire Windows 7 product cycle? And that’s just a selection.
Still, putting the information we do have into a table, we get this:
The buyer’s program row is about the programs where buyers of the current version get the next version for cheapsies. The program for Windows starts June 26, Apple’s starts June 8. Windows’ program goes for both OEM and retail copies, Apple’s program only goes for “OEM” copies.
Then there’s the discussion about which of the two releases is a bigger, and more worthwhile upgrade. For me, that question is pretty clear, but I’m sure you, our dear and loving readers, have ideas of your own about this one.
.. and eventually it will be free.
Vendors have to (try) make money higher up the stack.
Or in Apple’s case, lower down the stack.
Apple still is a hardware company that makes software in order to sell the hardware.
This is one of the reasons I like Apple. Although the hardware is (questionably) more expensive, the software costs are lower than Windows (for me).
I burned a DVD the other day with my MacBook and I didn’t have to buy software for that.
Upgrading my family’s 3 MacBooks to the latest OS will only cost me $49!! Nice work Apple.
Edited 2009-06-08 23:04 UTC
Meh, didn’t they add this in Vista? Anyway, still using XP, and there’s gotta be at least a dozen free burners to choose from. CDBurnerXP, Infrarecorder, and ImgBurn immediately come to mind.
If just data, XP.
If a video DVD, Vista.
I guess I’d have to upgrade to Vista to create/burn DVD movies then, since I’m using XP. That sucks.
Yeah, but what does it cost to upgrade 3 PCs to Vista or Windows 7?
People often overlook how complete the software is with OS X compared to Windows, when comparing Windows to OS X.
The standard non-free Windows office suite is also much more expensive than OS X’s office suite. I bought iLife for 3 Macs for $129. What does 3 copies of MS Office cost?
Oh I know.. just install Open Office… but I’m just trying to make a fair comparison.
But you’re not making a fair comparison. Since MS Office comes with more functionality out of the box than iWork does, you’re kind of comparing apples (no pun intended) and oranges. A more accurate comparison would be MS Office on Windows and MS Office on Mac.
Look, I’m not here to get into a pissing contest about which OS is cheaper/better, but when somebody dissses Windows because they think they have to shell out $$ to burn DVDs, that’s just dumb
The thing here is that sure, Snow Leopard sounds cheaper, but that’s only if you’re already a Mac owner. Nay, if you’re a Mac Intel owners.
If you’re not, than the price comparison falls flat on its ass. In the Windows world, people are used to buying hardware that more closely matches their needs for a lower pricer than that of a Mac, negating the price difference in operating system – and then some.
iLife is overestimated, as I challenge you to be honest and tell me how often YOU use GarageBand or iWeb. iPhoto is nice, but Picasa is as good as or better anyway, and iTunes is a piece of crap, but free.
iWork is a very good piece of work (I love it), but it doesn’t come with new Macs, and costs 79 EUR, while Microsoft Office 2007 costs 69 at retail here. And Office is a lot more full-featured (comes with Word/Excel/PowerPoint/OneNote).
So, well, yeah.
But still, if you already own Leopard, Snow Leopard truly has nice price! Can’t wait until September!
You are WRONG as the non-free Windows Office Suite IS NOT MUCH MORE expensive. OK OK OK $30.00 could buy an OS X upgrade
I imagine you meant iWork not iLife for an Office Suite…
Your Apple love and Microsoft disgust prevents you from doing any research other than how awesome Apple is…
Office 2008 for Mac Home and Student Edition Suite
# Word 2008 for Mac
# Excel 2008 for Mac
# PowerPoint 2008 for Mac
# Entourage 2008 for Mac
$159.00 package
One license allows for installation on as many as three computers.
tSource:
http://store.microsoft.com/microsoft/Office-2008-for-Mac-Home-and-S…
Edited 2009-06-09 05:41 UTC
Windows 7 upgrade costs are infinitely more expensive than upgrade costs (or new installation costs for that matter) of some alternative OSes.
Depending on your needs, Windows 7 might be infinitely better than some alternative OSes. In this case, better pay for something that works than having nothing at all, eh?
While I am fully aware that the price can be a big deal depending in many parts of the world, paying a minute fraction of your wages for something you will use daily for years to come doesn’t seem a bad deal to me. 50 USD is less than the average daily pay in my area. It gets even lower if you amortize the cost on many years. Sure, it will still be infinitely more expensive than zero, but the daily cost would be so low that the result won’t matter.
Of course, paying more for something that can fulfill your needs when you can get the same thing for less isn’t wise. That’s another story.
Windows 7 will work? What about when you hook up your internet? Will it keep working? Or will you have to bog it down to about 66% as fast by buying a yearly subscription Internet Security suite to keep safe in the shark infested waters?
Glad I’m using Linux… Installed in 1 hr with all my software there, and all my hardware working right out of the gate. Just a couple clicks away and I can play DVD’s and everything I need to do…and free to boot! You can keep your Windows upgrade ransom…
I’d actually pay for the Mac upgrade, and considering the use of expensive IPS LCD screens and quality hardware, the iMac actually checks out as a good deal to boot. The cost comparisons never factor in that those inexpensive PC’s get garbage TN LCD screens, junk keyboards and such.
One typically pays for Windows 7 as a pre-installed OS, part of the purchase of a new machine, guaranteed by the OEM to work on that machine.
If one were allowed to purchase an alternative OS under the same circumstances, there is simply no way that it would not work better than Windows. Your premise that it is “better pay for something that works than having nothing at all” is quite true, but the only problem with it is that it is not Windows 7 that is the product likely to be the one that works.
There is a reason for that, Microsoft has the customer by the proverbial balls. Microsoft know that they can keep ratchetting up the price so that it is just expensive enough to gouge every cent out of the end users wallet but not enough to make it desirable in moving to an alternative operating system. They have been doing this for years with StarOffice; push up the price high enough but not too high that the cost of moving over to StarOffice is cheaper than continuing with Microsoft Office.
What the public need to be informed of is this has been going on for years and things won’t change until they as end users bight the bullet and make the switch. If they look at the long term costs they would realise that there are better alternatives that may have a slightly up front cost but long term they are considerably cheaper.
At this time, customers are not offered any choice. As soon as any OEM offers a Linux option that is visible to the public (side by side available with Winndows machines of comparable hardware) … Microsoft will pay the OEM to take the Linux machine off the market.
If this keeps happening, OEMs could be on a real winner here. Just keep offering a decent Linux option for each new model of machine as it comes out. Constantly playing whack-a-mole trying to suppress each Linux offering as it comes to market is likely to keep Microsoft utterly distracted and it will also cost them a pretty penny to the OEMs complete profit.
In addition to this, in some market segments new machines that cannot run Windows 7 at all, and which are cheaper and perform better in a particular role than machines which can run Windows 7, are starting to become available as well.
I don’t imagine that even Microsoft can keep this game of whack-a-mole up forever.
Edited 2009-06-09 05:53 UTC
What is the price for the Ultimate edition?
Comparing Windows Home Premium isn’t a match to Snow Leopard…. Home can’t talk to Domains, AD’s or Exchange for one thing… only Business/Professional/Ultimate can do that. OSX only has Desktop and Server editions, so when you buy any Mac you get all the best features…. no second class users with the company trying to take advantage of business users “up the food chain”.
Without question, OSX is equal or better than any of the Windows 7 editions, the only benefit is sunk investment in applications that are Windows only…. but that goes away with every new version when vendors won’t keep up with new versions for the new Windows OS in a timely fashion. In many ways Leopard versus Vista was a schooling in small vendors getting their act together for Leopard quickly, while the big, safe, established vendors had problems or unsupported software for a longer time under windows.
I’ve LOVE to hear a Snow Leopard vs. Windows 7 debate. Bring it on!
Any such debates on sites like this are always too superficial. For example, I saw one Windows vs OSX article comparing Windows Explorer to Finder, which is really kind of pointless, since no power user would ever be caught dead using Explorer (and I assume Finder as well), unless they were forced to.
The only real way to compare these operating systems is to take the best of each app ‘genre’ (both free and commercial) that each OS has to offer and put them head-to-head against each other. Because, afterall, an OS is only as good as the applications it runs.
Really? I consider myself a power user and use nothing but Explorer (plus the windows command line and occasionally cygwin if it’s installed). And thinking about it I don’t actually know anyone who doesn’t use Explorer as their main Windows file manager.
Sure it’s not great and sure there are arguably better third party file managers out there, but given how (relatively) little general file management I do it never seemed worth the effort to install a third party file manager on all the windows machines I happen to touch.
Agreed
I agree, however, I use Total Comander
Haha, I used to same the same thing. Then I installed Directory Opus and realized the error of my ways
The only real way to compare these operating systems is to take the best of each app ‘genre’ (both free and commercial) that each OS has to offer and put them head-to-head against each other. Because, afterall, an OS is only as good as the applications it runs.
Except you are not comparing two OSes side by side, but two customized control systems, laden with third party apps which are in NO way part of the OS. So how are we comparing the OSes, when we replace the standard components as much as possible?
Well, I guess you’re not. You’re really comparing the apps, which is what you SHOULD be comparing, since an OS (in practical terms) is only as good as the applications it runs.
It’s like comparing Opera/Chrome/Safari vs Firefox… if you didn’t include the extensions that Firefox runs, it wouldn’t even be a comparison, since Firefox without extensions is really quite boring, same as Windows